EARLY HEARING DETECTION AND INTERVENTION VIRTUAL CONFERENCE
MARCH 2-5, 2021
(Virtually the same conference, without elevators, airplane tickets, or hotel room keys)
9/25/2018 | 10:00 AM - 10:15 AM | The Effects of Electric Power Lines on the Breeding Ecology of Greater Sage-Grouse | Eccles Conference Center Auditorium
The Effects of Electric Power Lines on the Breeding Ecology of Greater Sage-Grouse
Anthropogenic infrastructure can negatively affect wildlife. Grassland birds may be particularly vulnerable to tall anthropogenic structures because they evolved in ecosystems void of vertical structures. In the western U.S., electric power transmission and distribution lines occur within the range of the greater sage-grouse (Centrocercus urophasianus; sage-grouse). The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service recommended using buffer zones near leks to mitigate the impacts of power lines on sage-grouse. However, because data are lacking, recommended buffer zones are inconsistent across state and federal agencies. To address this, we evaluated the effects of power lines on sage-grouse breeding ecology within Utah and the surrounding areas from 1998-2013. Power lines negatively affected lek trends and persistence at distances up to 2.7 and 2.8 km, respectively. Female sage-grouse were displaced by transmission lines during the nesting and brooding seasons at distances up to 1.1 and 0.8 km, respectively. Nest and brood success reduced by transmission lines up to distances of 2.6 and 1.1 km, respectively. Distribution lines did not affect sage-grouse habitat selection or reproductive fitness. Moreover, our analyses demonstrated the value of habitat quality in mitigating power line impacts. Thus, conservation planners can minimize the effects of new power lines by placing them in existing anthropogenic corridors and/or incorporating no surface occupancy buffers within 2.8 km from active leks. Given this is the first landscape-level comparison examining the relationship between power lines and sage-grouse breeding habitat, our results are relevant to sage-grouse management as well as other galliformes that are affected by anthropogenic structures.
Presentation:
This presentation has not yet been uploaded.
Handouts:
Handout is not Available
Transcripts:
CART transcripts are NOT YET available, but will be posted shortly after the conference
Presenters/Authors
Michel Kohl
(), Utah State University, michel.kohl@usu.edu;
ASHA DISCLOSURE:
Financial -
Nonfinancial -
Terry Messmer
(), Utah State University, terry.messmer@usu.edu;
ASHA DISCLOSURE:
Financial -
Nonfinancial -
Benjamin Crabb
(), bcrabb@gmail.com;
ASHA DISCLOSURE:
Financial -
Nonfinancial -
David Dahlgren
(), dave.dahlgren@usu.edu;
ASHA DISCLOSURE:
Financial -
Nonfinancial -
Randy Larsen
(), BYU, randy_larsen@byu.edu;
ASHA DISCLOSURE:
Financial -
Nonfinancial -
Shandra Frey
(), Utah State University, nicki.frey@usu.edu;
ASHA DISCLOSURE:
Financial -
Nonfinancial -
Sherry Liguori
(), Rocky Mountain Power, sherry.liguori@rockymountainpower.net;
ASHA DISCLOSURE:
Financial -
Nonfinancial -
Rick Baxter
(), Brigham Young University, rjb47rjb47@gmail.com;
ASHA DISCLOSURE:
Financial -
Nonfinancial -