EARLY HEARING DETECTION AND INTERVENTION VIRTUAL CONFERENCE
MARCH 2-5, 2021
(Virtually the same conference, without elevators, airplane tickets, or hotel room keys)
6/07/2017 | 10:15 AM - 10:30 AM | COMPARING DENITRIFICATION RATES BETWEEN RESTORED AND NATURALIZED FLOODPLAINS IN AGRICULTURAL DITCHES | 302A
COMPARING DENITRIFICATION RATES BETWEEN RESTORED AND NATURALIZED FLOODPLAINS IN AGRICULTURAL DITCHES
Enhancing nitrogen (N) removal in agricultural streams and ditches of the Midwestern US is one potential mechanism to reduce N export to sensitive downstream ecosystems. The restoration of inset floodplains via implementation of the two-stage ditch can enhance denitrification compared to channelized systems, however, little is known about how denitrification on restored floodplains compares to those formed naturally when stream channel management lapses. We used sacrificial microcosm incubations and membrane-inlet mass spectrometry (MIMS) to compare denitrification rates in floodplain soils collected along transects in both naturalized and restored floodplains; longitudinal transects sampled two zones in the active floodplain (near-stream, NS vs. middle, MID) while the third reflected upland conditions in the riparian buffer strip (UP). Denitrification rates ranged from 500-730 ugN/m/hr and 800-2,200 ugN/m/hr in the naturalized and restored inset floodplains, respectively. Denitrification in the MID transects were >70% higher in the restored floodplain compared to naturalized, highlighting contrasts between constructed floodplains and the heterogeneity in depositional bars typical of naturalizing channels. Consequently, restored inset floodplains would remove >50% more N than the naturalized floodplains during similar inundation events.
- C10 Biogeochemistry
- C27 Landuse and Non-Point source Impacts
- C08 Urban Ecology & C16 Restoration Ecology
Presentation:
This presentation has not yet been uploaded.
Handouts:
Handout is not Available
Transcripts:
CART transcripts are NOT YET available, but will be posted shortly after the conference
Presenters/Authors
Brittany Hanrahan
(), USDA Agricultural Research Service, br.hanrahan@gmail.com;
ASHA DISCLOSURE:
Financial -
Nonfinancial -
Jennifer L. Tank
(), University of Notre Dame, tank.1@nd.edu;
ASHA DISCLOSURE:
Financial -
Nonfinancial -
Martha M. Dee
(), University of Notre Dame, mdee@nd.edu;
ASHA DISCLOSURE:
Financial -
Nonfinancial -
Matt Trentman
(), Flathead Lake Biological Station, University of Montana, matt.trentman@flbs.umt.edu;
ASHA DISCLOSURE:
Financial -
Nonfinancial -
Sara McMillan
(), Purdue University, mcmill@purdue.edu;
ASHA DISCLOSURE:
Financial -
Nonfinancial -