2023 Early Hearing Detection & Intervention Conference
March 5-7, 2023 • Cincinnati, OH
10/25/2016 | 9:45 AM - 11:00 AM | Detection of Hearing Impairment in Patients with Subjective Complaints of Hearing Loss Using the Whispered Voice Test and Standard Pure Tone Audiometry: A Prospective, Double-blind, Cross-sectional Study | BGPOP Building 402/403/404
Detection of Hearing Impairment in Patients with Subjective Complaints of Hearing Loss Using the Whispered Voice Test and Standard Pure Tone Audiometry: A Prospective, Double-blind, Cross-sectional Study
Objectives: To determine the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, positive likelihood ratio, negative likelihood ratio, and accuracy of the whispered voice test compared with standard pure tone audiometry in detecting hearing impairment in patients with subjective complaints of hearing loss.
Methods: Study Design: Prospective, Double-blinded, Cross-sectional Study Setting: Tertiary Private Hospital Subjects: 55 consecutive patients who underwent hearing evaluation via pure tone audiometry.
Results: 55 subjects composed of 60% (n=33) females and 40% (n=22) males with ages ranging from 13-85 years old (Mean±SD=44.99 ± 19.19) were included in the study. 58.2% (n=64) ears responded correctly in the whispered voice test while 59.1% (n=65) had normal hearing threshold on pure tone audiometry. There was significant association between age and whispered voice test (Pearson’s chi-square=68.24, df=27, level of significance=0.05, p-value=0.000). The same significant association between age and pure tone audiometry results (Pearson’s chi-square=70.52, df=27, level of significance=0.05, p-value=0.000) was found. There was also significant association between the whispered voice test and pure tone audiometry results (Pearson’s chi-square=151.59, df=27, level of significance=0.05, p-value=0.000). Sensitivity and specificity of the whispered voice test were 93.75% and 89.13%, respectively. Positive predictive value was 92.31% and negative predictive value was 91.11%. The positive likelihood ratio was at 8.62 while the negative likelihood ratio was at 0.07. Accuracy was computed at 91.82%.
Conclusions: The results in this study are comparable to those of previous studies. The whispered voice test is an accurate tool in the detection of hearing loss. It can be used as an alternative to audiometric evaluation in the screening of patients with subjective complaints of hearing loss by ENT specialists and general practitioners in the urban and rural setting. Keywords whispered voice test, pure tone audiometry, hearing screening, sensitivity, specificity, diagnosis, hearing loss.
- To determine the sensitivity and specificity of the whispered voice test compared to standard pure tone audiometry in detecting hearing impairment in patients with subjective complaints of hearing loss.
- To determine the positive predictive value, negative predictive value, positive likelihood ratio, and negative likelihood ratio of the whispered voice test compared to standard pure tone audiometry in detecting hearing impairment in patients with subjective complaints of hearing loss.
- To determine the accuracy of the whispered voice test compared to standard pure tone audiometry in detecting hearing impairment in patients with subjective complaints of hearing loss.
Presentation:
This presentation has not yet been uploaded.
Handouts:
Handout is not Available
Transcripts:
CART transcripts are NOT YET available, but will be posted shortly after the conference
Presenters/Authors
Giselle Gotamco
(), Department of Otorhinolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, University of Santo Tomas Hospital, gigigot@yahoo.com;
Dr. Giselle L. Gotamco graduated from the University of Santo Tomas Faculty of Medicine and Surgery. She spent her post-graduate internship at the Chinese General Hospital and Medical Center. She is currently a third year resident of the Department of Otorhinolaryngology – Head and Neck Surgery of the University of Santo Tomas Hospital.
ASHA DISCLOSURE:
Financial -
Nonfinancial -
Norberto Martinez
(), Department of Otorhinolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, University of Santo Tomas Hospital, earcenter@yahoo.com;
1974-1978 Bachelor of Science in General Science, UST College of Science
1978-1982 Medical Degree, UST Faculty of Medicine and Surgery
1982-1983 Internship: Our Lady of Lourdes Hospital
1983 Physicians' Licensure Examination
1984-1988 Residency: STUH Department of Otorhinolaryngology
6/88-5/89 Fellow: Neuro-Otology, Department of Otorhinolaryngology
7/88-10/88 Fellowship: Siriraj Hospital – Neuro-Otological Center, Bangkok, Thailand
1/89-6/89 Fellowship: Zurich University Hospital, Switzerland
1989 Diplomate: Philippine Board Of Otorhinolaryngology – Head and Neck Surgery
1989 Fellow: Philippine Society of Otorhinolaryngology – Head and Neck Surgery
1991 Founding Member: Philippine Association of Endoscopic Surgeons
ASHA DISCLOSURE:
Financial -
Nonfinancial -